Well yeah, they had a problem with any kind that makes them lose.

They just take issue with brown people immigrating here.

Peak genetics right there!

Oh wait, do you mean he is finally starting to realize Israel is (In this case) the bad guy in the dispute?

PS Yes, yes, yes, I know, Iran isn’t “the good guy” in most respects, I mean in the case of this war.

So, she’s calling out the press secretary bullshitting the media, just like she did?

And we’re going to fucking revive measles and polio while we’re at it?

Yep. Thats the US right now.

As the contradictions grow with capitalism, they will fuel the revolutionary change of the proletariat…

https://sociology.institute/introduction-to-sociology/karl-marx-analysis-capitalism-historical-perspective/#the-contradictions-of-capitalism

all the churches should be struck down by whatever “God” they pretend to follow.

I mean, if we wanna throw their own book at them… Revelations calls them out. They’re the seven churches.

What happened to America’s passion to learn?

Unions died.

Republicans have been eliminating progressive news and media for years.

They really haven’t… The issue is far deeper than that.

Fear based pushing of media doesn’t work so well outside of a cult. The problem atheists have isn’t that we don’t have our own sunday services, where we teach a different “fire and brimestone” message… Its that those sorts of “tools” just don’t work with people broken away from indoctrination.

Way back when, I ran two “new sites”: One was a progressive media site, and the other a conservative one (Before I had a stronger moral compass), and running ads on both.

The progressive one earned almost nothing. The conservative one? I was easily bringing in ~$40/month in ad rev, without doing anything, really. I wrote two stories, about the same thing, and just tweaked the language for each to cater to the side I was publishing to.

Oddly, or not, the most commonly clicked ad was penis enlargement pills, and “Hot moms looking to cheat” type ads.

Those are only facts if someone enforces it at the business end of a weapon.

She lost, because (IMO) she basically gave a big middle finger to:

• Leftists
• Progressives
• Arab-Americans

And, because she decided these people were great people:

• Dick Cheney
• Bill Kristol
• Georgie Bush
• Mike Pence

You know? The war criminals and war criminal enablers.

The lesson Dems need to learn is that no matter how much they shift right, they’re not winning GOP voters. All they are doing is shedding voters on the left. The whole “Vote for us because other team is bad” rings hollow when you’re doing everything the other team is doing, too.

Harris was a full communist to the GOP.

I dont think it matters much.

He was literally telling them live on TV to go storm the Capitol.

That is called “prima facie”: facts that speak for themselves.

And it is fully valid to use as a test in a process already codified in law: secretary of state (or similar postition) decides ballot eligibility.

We didn’t see Trump break into the White House.

We saw him tell his people to go do it, and the refuse to tell them to stop it.

That’s called “leading an insurrection”.

You watch them on TV doing it. And after you see them on TV doing it, they become unqualified for office, based on the due process afforded by the state attorney generals, and/or departments that manage who is and who isn’t qualified and can be placed on a ballot, per due process.

You don’t need a court to adjudicate being of improper age, do you? Certain items can be considered “prima facie”… Basically: You, and everyone else watched it happens is considered prima facie for processes like this.

The fifth amendment doesn’t apply to impeachment, nor does it in the event of ballot qualifications. Like, the 5th amendment doesn’t apply to age restrictions on holding public office.

The law says,“If you engaged in insurrection, you are ineligible to hold federal office”. Just like is says,“If you are under 35, you are ineligible to hold the office of President”.

They only read part of the 2A, as well, and none of the context in the rest of the document about it, either.

The whole “well regulated militia”, and who and why the militia is.

Or, by running through sand or mud!

If the US strikes any NATO member, it’s an automatic declaration of war against the aggressor state, which in this case would be the US, under Article 5 of the NATO treaty.

If it doesn’t result in an automatic declaration, that means NATO has failed, and isn’t worth the paper it’s written on. It’s a mutual defense treaty.

Not all do. That’s an oak thing really. Pines, most stone fruits, etc, take a path of least resistance, unlike oaks which are more “I am going that way, and NOTHING will stop me!”