

How humiliating it must be to work for this man.
great american humorist. non-aesthetic socialist libtard. proud appalachian-american.


How humiliating it must be to work for this man.


Subd. 3. Exemption. The prohibitions in subdivision 2 do not apply when the website, application, software, program, or other service requires the technical skill of a user to nudify an image or video.
I get the idea, but this doesn’t comfort me, because what is “technical skill” here? That seems subjective and will ultimately be up to a court to decide. What constitutes a skill? It’s prompting a skill? Is prompting Photoshop’s AI a skill? Their lasso tool is pretty easy to use. The line isn’t clear, and a clever lawyer, or a judge, or a jury could come down differently on what counts and what doesn’t.
I get the goal here. But I think we were already covered by the existing law that made distribution of these artificial nudes illegal.


Creating and distributing AI nudes of people was already illegal in Minnesota. This is a separate law that makes hosting or providing any service or “software” that has the ability to do that illegal. It is broadly worded and makes more than the intended target illegal, which was already illegal to begin with.


Elon Musk says
ok


The list, if anyone was curious:


Not smooth, just that the PATRIOTS showed out in such numbers that Xi couldn’t print enough ballots to overcome them. Factories cranking out millions of fake DEMONRAT ballots were beaten by the hard working PATRIOTS showing up in numbers never seen before! Some say the biggest numbers.


If the teaparty people could do it, so can we.


Not famous. And I haven’t seen confirmation about who it is, only strong suspicions online (often posited as fact). That’s what makes this so weird.


Seems like a lot of people don’t recognize that they aren’t “in on it” until it’s too late.


Cool. So when do we start bombing and invading the Cayman Islands? I’m sure they’ll make a great 51st state.
Razzia, formerly Rahoot. Self hostable.


Well, I mean, there is a lack of privacy. That’s kind of how the platform exists architecturally. I just don’t find that to be a problem, per se. It’s a social platform, which makes sense to me for everything on the protocol to be “open” to one degree or another. Not everything has to be securitymaxxed.
You are on the right path. Most stuff people self host requires very little horsepower. Most of your CPU will be idle in the end. Things might get expensive if you want to add a lot of storage, but the good news is that can be added later as you need it. I think you’ll be surprised just how much a modern-ish laptop can host.
I love the Dells I use. They’re wonderful little workhorses, and I got a pretty good deal as they used to mine chia cryptocurrency.



I know it wasn’t your point, but I’d like to add that when some rightoid inevitably tries to give the impression they care about “a black woman being held back” and how racist the Democrats are it’s imperative we ignore them. They’re only trying to use our empathy against us with superficial grievances.


I can believe it for their best developers.
What would worry me is this being true for their middle and low tier developers.


I suspect there will be a new rotating villain to vote for it.


Anyone got the VOD of this dating show stream? I’d be interested in seeing it.
Double humiliating.