What’s bothering you then chum ? That China competes with the US in facial recognition software and using it on it citizens ?

What’s your point exactly ?

That governments who regularly condemn china in public as authoritarian, privately crave more surveillance power over their own citizens? ?

deleted by creator

Only novice PMs do that and believe it or not, the project manager carries the can for failure .

HA

A good project manager doubles your number an adds 20% anyway.

Triples it if you are working more than one project.!

Profound

Like ransom ware

That’s a chicken

Is there no method of self policing for the judiciary or legal profession?

Laughs in AIPAC

It. Was. A. Joke.

Omg I heard he had fanboys but never seen it myself. A bit like Swifties.

So … I make a cheap gag about the French authorities torturing a man at a secret location, and you’re triggered about being raped with a loaf of bread ?

For real ?

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

6 months ago I made a ridiculous joke about Trump giving Musk Texas.

This is literally worse than I could possibly imagine.

And that’s a block Jeff. Im not wasting another second on soap opera.

Well it’s a good point - my math is not bad but it is limited, as you have shown.

However, I wouldn’t rush to support your effort to amortise the issue over such a broad cross section of the electorate and certainly not to speculate about a lifetime impact.

Sure . Everyone has a strong opinion on abortion - because its both binary and emotive.

But 630,000 abortions were performed in 2019, on a population of 330,000,000.

Which I think is about 0.2% of Americans.

So assuming when you vote you are voting to improve your own situation or for a better America., and whether you are pro life or pro choice, should this be the No.1 issue on the card for most people ?

When you stack it against universal health care, or getting the federal minimum wage to $20, or school meals, or fracking, or taxation , it doesn’t come close in terms of number of people affected.

This is no way to belittle the trauma experienced by those directly affected by it.

It is just to illustrate how emotive and polemic issues are used to divide the electorate and avoid them voting in unison on other, arguably bigger issues .