I thought the article was criticizing the portrayal of “noble savages” 🫤

This is what “you cannot destroy the master’s home with the master’s tools” refers to. More misinformation isn’t going to help even if it is well intentioned.

I’m pretty sure he has an invisible tattoo.

The revolution will not be televised or tweeted. Just look at how Luigi got censored once it became obvious they couldn’t control the narrative.

I mean, who hasn’t allegedly choked a stripper while high on cocaine?

WWDD? (what would the devil do?)

• Mike Johnson probably

Which explains why Democratic leadership approved the GOP budget in the past: enabling Republicans to do their worse is their election strategy.

Exactly. Newsom can probably win in 2028, and the Republican party will be stronger for it.

Newsom is good enough like Biden was good enough in 2020. Everyone is learning the wrong lessons.

I wear skinny jeans, cross my legs, iron my clothes, pluck hair and eat soup. I guess that makes me a lesbian by his logic? My wife will be surprised to know we immaculately conceived our two children. I’m a dad, these fuckers don’t get to tell me how to be feminine if I so desire. When I want to dress up as someone without any thing I recognize as masculinity, I’ll dress up as this (probably pedo) priest.

Best we can do is Gavin Newsom. Democratic leadership is brain dead ATM.

Missing from the article: lessons learned.

I am high and you are correct.

The people with Trumpgret didn’t get there by people telling them they fucked up. These people don’t value your opinion so telling them they’re wrong is fulfilling your own needs, not anyone else’s.

You can address the inaction of voters without making it about blaming individuals with as much power as yourself. But telling people “I told you so” serves a different need.

How exactly does blaming your neighbors create meaningful change? I don’t care whether you think it’s right or wrong, I am asking how it actually helps improve the system.

That’s oligarchy apologetics bullshit to keep us from changing the system. No need to make things more democratic if we’re blaming the majority of people.

*Won the popular vote but still a minority (<50%) voted for this.

It was a system of checks and balances, but the Democrats went along with consolidating power. So while yes, they aren’t the direct cause, they were the adults in the room and they failed in that responsibility.

Every empire’s days are numbered, but I don’t think I can count that high