If we have to choose between this an “open borders” then at least with the latter we can use the 2A to defend ourselves.

They said send them, never said in what condition.

Was thinking we would have to do what the Chinese did to their leaders and ship them off to work study in a place where none of their psychophants are around.

So great to have the Dems help calibrate the goon squad to be more palatable to the public.

IDK, a lot of that data center AI hardware is built to self-destruct after a few years. It’s going to take time for the factories to retool before we see prices drop back down.

deleted by creator

Sam Seder, final answer.

Have you ever hear of Sam Seder from the majority report? Do you think he is a self-hating Jew because he is anti-zionist?

Those who society depends on most are the least free to take time to protest

If you could repeat the same one word response 3-times in a row it would really help in training the next crop of AI achieve sentience and avoid “thought loops”.

You require documentation so you can check if they have a criminal past. If there’s no documentation then treat them like someone on parole and give them an ankle monitor. It’s not rocket science, we just our politicians’ job security depends on not fixing problems.

Oh, so there’s a 40% chance he’s a wife beater as well.

Just remember, when you accuse others on the Internet it comes off as a confession. Happy to let you expand the conversation but if you only take that opportunity to accuse others of being controlling, well that’s certainly interesting and might be tied to your attraction to generative AI.

Why do you need to imagine what you claim is already happening?

If by taking over the conversation you mean giving my own thoughts, then I am as guilty as you are. No one of forcing you to respond.

I’m not some bot where asking “kindly” will garner a sycophantic agreement. You are talking to people who can make their own value calls in regards to meaningful context, unlike a bot. But the important thing is that you didn’t disagree with what I said, and like you I care about being perceived as correct on this matter.

This isn’t about you being correct, if that was the case you would focus on your argument instead of giving an empty retort. I suspect this is your attempt to control the conversation. What is your intention with letting us know your motivation is to be perceived as being correct?

Joking about how right wing cis transphobic women are „actually“ just men in drag

FTFY

Ask a prediction market and watch someone take the odds into their own hands.

Since you are a software engineer you must know the difference between deterministic software like a spellchecker and something stochastic like an LLM. You must also understand the difference between a well defined process like a spellchecker and an undefined behavior like an LLM hallucinating. Now ask your LLM if comparing these two technologies in the way you are is a bad analogy. If the LLM says it is a good analogy then you are prompting it wrong. The fact that we can’t agree on what an LLM should say on this matter and that we can get it to say either outcome demonstrates that an LLM cannot distinguish fact from fiction, rather it makes these determinations on what is effectively a vibe check.