• 0 Posts
  • 25 Comments
Joined 6 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 13th, 2026

help-circle

  • No, sorry.

    From an economic angle, that level of control is hard power, as removing it, or worse, putting behind an opponent, can be as damaging, and coersive

    That’s just objectively untrue. It only becomes hard power when they lean on that influence coercively. The implication that it could be taken away is the literal definition of soft power. A direct threat to take it away as leverage would be hard power.

    When China builds a port in Djibouti, the implication is that if Djibouti doesn’t conform largely to China’s geopolitical goals in the region the port could be shut down or funding pulled. That’s soft power, even though it carries conditions, because of the ambiguous and uncertain nature of the consequences. China in this example wouldn’t be exercising “hard power” unless they actively threatened to pull all Chinese shipping to and from the port or change the parameters of the loan structure to get the country to fall in line.



  • zeejoo@thelemmy.clubtoComic Strips@lemmy.worldA racial slur
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Sorry, no. Sponsoring a ballroom or paying for an inauguration are examples of soft power. Hard power is when you use coercive means to achieve your goals, in a geopolitical sense (where the terms come from) hard power is military action or the threat thereof, or economic sanctions. Funding things, building things and paying for things are examples of soft power. A billionaires version of hard power would be blackmail or a hostile takeover.







  • $100 doesn’t make it better. $100 to find out, for most people, absolutely nothing of substance, and they PAID to turn over their DNA for free. I thought it was like a $49.99 kinda thing and even then I wouldn’t have done it and didn’t. And if $100 is the basic, it only goes up from there, no?



  • zeejoo@thelemmy.clubtomemes@lemmy.worldAVP_irl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    5 months ago

    You’re proving my point dumbass. You copied two comments and pasted them into a word count website to make a point in a meme subreddit

    Lemmy is much better than reddit in so many ways but you can’t escape the losers.




  • zeejoo@thelemmy.clubtomemes@lemmy.worldAVP_irl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    5 months ago

    If you can’t look at that source, read it for 5 seconds and realize it’s a shithole rag of disinformation and conspiracy theories, then you probably should be relying on other people to parse information for you. If you can’t find another source on the same information by using your thumbs, then you may want to get off the internet altogether. OP clearly wasn’t trying to fool anyone or spread disinformation, it’s a meme and you losers are in here demanding a better bibliography.


  • zeejoo@thelemmy.clubtomemes@lemmy.worldAVP_irl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    5 months ago

    I know this is a meme sub

    Then why did you comment? You know that everyone who saw this meme chuckled, and then either went “probably bullshit” and moved on, or googled it, found out it’s click bait and moved on. You accomplish nothing but giving yourself a soap box.





  • zeejoo@thelemmy.clubtoScience Memes@mander.xyz*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Where I’m from people use it frequently, but never about disabled people. They just mean stupid. In that capacity I agree, it’s literally the same on every level as idiot, moron, imbecile, feeble-minded, dumb, etc.

    If someone uses the word to refer to a mentally handicapped or disabled person, we’re gonna fight. If you call attacking Iran retarded, I agree wholeheartedly.