• s@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Put another pullback motor in but backwards and you’ve got yourself infinite energy

    • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      9 hours ago

      You’ve just revolutionized green energy! I expect your Nobel Prize is in the mail!

      Better start working on a speech!

    • notabot@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Nobel committee? Yes… that one right there… they’ve just solved the world’s energy problems forever, please give them all the medals!

      • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Sorry we don’t give medals anymore. Last time we gave out a medal to someone, Trump invaded their country and only left when the medal was given to him. Our insurance company just won’t allow it anymore.

    • ButteryMonkey@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Hand-crank starters were in production until the 90s apparently. The lada niva (a small weird truck thing) had them through 1998. Who knew?

      I know it’s not quite the same but… wind up key part is! I was gunna find a pic but there don’t seem to be any showing the crank in use, only videos.

  • cybervseas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I can’t remember which car but an early hybrid vehicle did charge up a flywheel instead of an electric battery…

    • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I heard about a version that used springs as well. Basically a pull-back car: When you break, it puts tension on the springs, then it releases that tension when accelerating. Apparently it was very good for city-driving, since you get an absurd number of cycles with very small “charges”, which makes it very good when you do a lot of start/stop driving in slow traffic. I’m not sure why I haven’t heard any more about it in more recent years.

      • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Bcz springs wear out is my guess. That’s the first thing I’d worry about in the design is how many cycles can it handle before performance is degraded. Might be a lot, but even if it’s a couple years, people aren’t going to be happy when their car performance suddenly drops off right after they finish paying the thing off.

    • Opisek@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      8 hours ago

      For this to work, you’ve gotta bring more weight down than you do back up.

      Thankfully, you can just leave all your hopes and dreams at the workplace to make your car lighter on the way back!

    • egrets@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 hours ago

      So you reverse the car to work and then coast your way home on spring power? I guess you’d have to go the long way into work.

  • Norn@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    This reminds me of the advanced spring powered devices in Syberia (the adventure game). I wonder if it is even remotely feasible to store that much power in springs, probably not.