• dbtng@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    This article whitewashed the whole thing and accepted LG’s angle, right up to reprinting their bullshit in full.
    Such crap is entirely insufficient for a tech publication, “Tom’s Hardware has not independently verified either the claims made by Gamers Nexus in its documentary or LG’s counterclaims.”

    Why? Why did you publish and throw up your hands saying “we know nothing”?
    Was there possibly some money involved? Don’t want to piss off your advertisers?
    I reviewed this Stephen Warwick’s articles. He’s a corpo shill.
    Miserable excuse for journalism.

  • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    It’s crazy because if they allowed savvy users to cleanly opt out of everything, they’d still make a killing. Smart users who block ads and resist advertising and incentives have never really been a problem for companies. They aren’t being targeted for the most part, they just don’t want most people getting out of their web.

    I also don’t fully blame the companies. Consumers not only allowed this, they actively campaigned for it. For every company that has tried to push privacy, the Internet/populace has pushed back. Those of us who care are having to lie in the bed made by the rest because those companies that promoted privacy are starting to learn they have to adapt or survive. 15 years ago we literally had a phone made by a computer company and a phone made by an advertising company, and the right one didn’t win… so now it’s just following the trends the consumers demanded.

    • dbtng@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Wait … are you lamenting the demise of the Micro$oft phone?
      Seriously? In public and all? What the hell is wrong with you?
      For the record, I DO blame the companies.

      • Bakkoda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        46 minutes ago

        Very specifically says not fully blame. That means shared blame. Consumers keep eating shit with a spoon.

        • dbtng@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          27 minutes ago

          And that’s why I have to neuter any device I buy.
          Fuken pain in the ass, but that’s our world.

    • annoying_cyclist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      App Tracking Transparency on iOS devices is an interesting test case for this argument. When an app wants to track you, you’re asked in plain language whether you want to be tracked. You can say no. You don’t have to be a savvy user to say no, and the consent is explicit rather than being buried in a EULA that you don’t read. If you say no, the app will likely still work fine. Specific numbers vary, but somewhere between a majority and a vast majority of iOS users opt out when given that choice. How much that costs advertisers is harder to reason about (a lot of the data comes from advertisers themselves, who are hardly unbiased), but the data are at least consistent in arguing that ATT opt outs produce a quantifiable drop in ad engagement (clicks, etc) and ad spend.

      I’m personally a big fan of ATT. You shouldn’t have to be a savvy user to opt out of surveillance capitalism. I also don’t personally care that much about how effective online advertising networks are. But I think LG and similar companies are probably not off base to worry about making it possible to cleanly opt out of everything. From their perspective, that wouldn’t be a great outcome.

      • dbtng@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        21 minutes ago

        Its more than an opt in or out problem with LG.
        You remember, oh a fukin month ago? LG installs spywear with no prompt when you plug in one of their monitors on a pc. This TV shit is more of the same and certainly more egregious than other brands.

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      You don’t fully blame the companies? Do you also not fully blame rapists because those women dress so provocatively. I suppose they demanded the rape because they picked the wrong “sexy” dress years ago. So now the rapes are just following the trends they demanded!

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Person kills another human being = Life in prison or possible execution.

      Company kills a bunch of people = Maybe a fine.

  • Deebster@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    121
    ·
    11 hours ago

    The Gamers Nexus video is pretty convincing, and demonstrates the logs and activities they’re reporting. The LG response basically admits to half the things GN claimed, yet somehow LG says they’re lies. I guess it’ll work on people that only read headlines.

  • steelplatedmech@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Penalties and fines that have happened for breaking privacy laws has been too low for it to deter any companies making money off this that I don’t believe them.

  • JustEnoughDucks@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    11 hours ago

    They literally advertise the opposite to their advertising network, saying “we know everything that goes on in an LG living room”…

  • oyzmo@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Of course they deny! 😂 - We are spying on you, and btw installing adware without you noticing on our monitors, without telling you… we know that could cause you to not trust us, but really, you have to trust us now. Your concerns aren’t true! (we don’t like to phrase it to straight forward, that could cause legal troubles for the thing we don’t do) 😆

  • Brem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I bet they can legally claim “the concerns” “aren’t true”.

    Our concerns “don’t matter” to them.

    Privacy & safety are now a gated privilege for the social elite & most wealthy.

    We all know every device with any way to contact these companies are sending increasingly more information about us, and that info is sold to the highest bidder.

  • IceFoxX@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    10 hours ago

    That’s what you get worked up about… But things like uXDT and so on don’t bother you? Ridiculous.

    • IceFoxX@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Wow, already 8 downvotes… So you guys actually love all the other tracking methods and are specifically bothered by just this one. Rofl

        • IceFoxX@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Nah, but most people here don’t even think about all the tracking methods from before the days of smart TVs and so on anymore. But since people are also getting upset about cameras, they might want to look up some research papers on displays—or, to be more precise, LEDs—and how an image can be created at close range using back-reflected light and voltage differences. And then there are so many other tracking methods that people have long since forgotten or never even knew about.

          I’d rather be upset that my own country is tracking me just as much and has its own shadow databases and so on. With all the EU’s plans—like EUDI, Omnibus, and so on—I find that far worse (I don’t mean to downplay it… but LG can’t just throw me in jail for having the wrong opinion or something like that…).

          Oh, and with incidents like this one… I still hold out hope that Western politicians might reconsider their stance on the fight against encryption, VPNs, and so on.

          • Axolotl@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            40 minutes ago

            With your mentality we shouldn’t complain or worry about anything since there is always something else to worry about, further more i’d like to add that (at least here on the fediverse) we complain always about all the kinds of privacy intrusions, i saw posts about all the kinds so your point is even more senseless