• Warl0k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Its been a defence for several hundred years, in fact! Showing intent is one of the three things you need to establish in every criminal case for it to be considered valid. Fuck the cops for dropping this case though, how in hell was there no intent to commit a crime here wtf.

    • Transporter Room 3@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Weird, I’ve literally always heard “ignorance of the law is no excuse to break the law”, which seems to imply criminal intent doesn’t matter. Only that the action that was take was illegal.

      • spongebue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s not intent to break the law, it’s intent to do what you did. If I walk out of a store with a can of tuna I didn’t pay for, that’s shoplifting, right? Well, not necessarily.

        If I walk into a store, pick it up off the shelf, hide it in my jacket, and dart for the exit, probably.

        If my toddler slipped it into my jacket pocket, and I didn’t notice, probably not.

        If I put it in my jacket pocket because my toddler started to run away, I forgot about it, and paid for a cart of groceries… Maybe? But unlikely to convince a jury beyond a reasonable doubt that it wasn’t an accident.