ekZepp@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 12 days agoWhat Refutes Science...lemmy.worldimagemessage-square77fedilinkarrow-up11.29Karrow-down118
arrow-up11.27Karrow-down1imageWhat Refutes Science...lemmy.worldekZepp@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 12 days agomessage-square77fedilink
minus-squareFiskFisk33@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·11 days agoCounterexamples only go so far. What you really need is counterexamples, and an analysis of their implications, including a probability study. In other words, well, science.
minus-squareRemember_the_tooth@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 days agoBecause of the implication.
Counterexamples only go so far. What you really need is counterexamples, and an analysis of their implications, including a probability study.
In other words, well, science.
Because of the implication.