Cat@ponder.cat to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoSyria just hosted its first international tech conference in 50 years.restofworld.orgexternal-linkmessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up156arrow-down15cross-posted to: hackernews
arrow-up151arrow-down1external-linkSyria just hosted its first international tech conference in 50 years.restofworld.orgCat@ponder.cat to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square14fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews
minus-squarecatloaf@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·1 day agoYou could read the article and find out.
minus-squarejust_another_person@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down5·1 day agoI’m not curious about WHO sponsored it…
minus-squarecatloaf@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·1 day agoThen use a complete sentence instead of leaving it ambiguous.
minus-squarejust_another_person@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·1 day agoThat is a grammatically correct sentence in English. What are you complaining about?
minus-squarecatloaf@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·1 day agoIt isn’t, really. In informal English, subject ellipsis is common, but the implied subject is usually “I”, hence my original comment. Subject ellipsis occurs in the casual register with first person as the predominant referent https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378216603000997
minus-squarejust_another_person@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·24 hours agoWell. Allow me to retort: https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/158607/is-curious-if-improper-to-use-compared-to-alternatives-such-as-curious-as-to
minus-squarecatloaf@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·24 hours agoYes, that supports what I was saying.
minus-squarejust_another_person@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·23 hours agoSays the exact opposite. Keep reading.
minus-squarecatloaf@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·23 hours agoI read the whole thing. I didn’t see any examples of “it is curious”, only “I am curious”.
minus-squarejust_another_person@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·22 hours agoRemoved by mod
minus-squarejust_another_person@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·24 hours agoRemoved by mod
You could read the article and find out.
I’m not curious about WHO sponsored it…
Then use a complete sentence instead of leaving it ambiguous.
That is a grammatically correct sentence in English. What are you complaining about?
It isn’t, really. In informal English, subject ellipsis is common, but the implied subject is usually “I”, hence my original comment.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378216603000997
Well. Allow me to retort: https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/158607/is-curious-if-improper-to-use-compared-to-alternatives-such-as-curious-as-to
Yes, that supports what I was saying.
Says the exact opposite. Keep reading.
I read the whole thing. I didn’t see any examples of “it is curious”, only “I am curious”.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod