I mentioned to someone this evening that they’re treating a presidentially authorized email as some kind of insider threat. And this person says, we’re surprised that Trump is an insider threat? To which I said, yes, I’m surprised that his own appointees are doing so.
Sounds like human word salad to me. *Word salad’s a bit harsh. I understand the message. Stream of consciousness?
I really hate this tendency to call everything AI. Especially this - my writing is very stream of consciousness if I don’t edit it, and I get accused of being so AI
Which is crazy because AI doesn’t do stream of consciousness. It usually is overly structured, or it’s nonsense. AI writing has low information density per word, where stream of consciousness is high (if harder to understand)
This article reads like it is barely edited AI slop or a twelve year old has written it.
Can you point out specific problematic AI-like segments?
Sounds like human word salad to me. *Word salad’s a bit harsh. I understand the message. Stream of consciousness?
I really hate this tendency to call everything AI. Especially this - my writing is very stream of consciousness if I don’t edit it, and I get accused of being so AI
Which is crazy because AI doesn’t do stream of consciousness. It usually is overly structured, or it’s nonsense. AI writing has low information density per word, where stream of consciousness is high (if harder to understand)