• CMLVI@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    I have a mutual friend at NOAA who does hurricane tracking in the plane, a lot of them are unlikely to remain employed. You’d think they’d want more people tracking these Dem-manufactured hurricanes, but I guess that isn’t an issue. If they were smart they’d destroy the hurricane making machine

    • ggppjj@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      12 days ago

      If we stop tracking the hurricanes then the number of tracked hurricanes in a season goes down what don’t you understand

      • CMLVI@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        12 days ago

        That’s a great point, let me ask him about that.

        It seems the more observers there are of a hurricane, the mroe likely it is to he destructive. I bet there were hurricanes 2 million years ago with 0 human deaths.

        Makes you think…

        • Droechai@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 days ago

          Without observation, can we even be sure there would be hurricanes?

          The traces and “evidence” might be from something else

    • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      What is the purported plan here? Are they thinking private industry will pick up everything NOAA is doing?

      There’s so many industries that rely on forecasting. Like if you want tax revenue then you need to forecast the weather.