LEBANON, Ohio (WCMH) — Ohio’s Republican candidate for U.S. Senate questioned why a certain group of women would be concerned about abortion during an event in the state.

NBC4 obtained a video recording from a Warren County town hall on Friday, where GOP Senate hopeful Bernie Moreno accused suburban women of being focused solely on their ability to get an abortion.

“You know, the left has a lot of single issue voters,” Moreno said. “Sadly, by the way, there’s a lot of suburban women, a lot of suburban women that are like, ‘Listen, abortion is it. If I can’t have an abortion in this country whenever I want, I will vote for anybody else.’ … OK. It’s a little crazy by the way, but — especially for women that are like past 50 — I’m thinking to myself, ‘I don’t think that’s an issue for you.'”

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    She got charged because she left the baby in the toilet, and even then they almost saved it.

    Get out of here with that “they almost saved it” bull. A full term pregnancy is 40 weeks. She was at 20 weeks as cited in the article. The most premature infant to survive by Guinness World Records for premature for survival of a premature birth is 21 weeks and 1 day. source

    She was ultimately cleared of blame, but this story is nowhere near being representative of normal miscarriage. My cousin had a late term miscarriage, my mom had late miscarriage with twins, and two of my sister in laws did as well. None of those cases came even close to being treated as anything other than regular, normal (but sad) miscarriage. They had small funerals and buried or cremated the babies in each of those cases.

    I’m sorry your family members experienced those miscarriages. They have no fault in those events. It is just biology at work. However I have to ask, are your family members black and residents of a southern state that has a long history of disproportionately charging people of color with crimes that they let white people off for? If you’re looking for another statistic to back up that statement, of the 44 people put to death by the state of South Carolina since capital punishment was enshrined in law 59% were white, while 39% were black (with 2% Native American), yet blacks make up only 25% of the population of South Carolina. The most recent person put to death by South Carolina was FOUR DAYS AGO…and yes, he was black.

    • OccamsRazer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      That may be so, but you can’t just get rid of laws because they could be used unjustly. All laws could be used unjustly.

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        That may be so, but you can’t just get rid of laws because they could be used unjustly.

        You absolutely can, and should.

        Law is supposed to be a mechanism to provide justice. If the outcome of a law is injustice, it fails fundamentally at what law is supposed to do and should be discarded. That doesn’t mean a just version of the law couldn’t be crafted, but if we, as a society, let unjust laws stand, then just laws will never be crafted. So yes, get rid of unjust laws.

        • OccamsRazer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Unjust laws can and should be eliminated, but people using laws unjustly cannot. Speeding is a crime, but it is not perfectly enforced. Cops let family members go more often, good looking people, people they identify with, etc. Speeding is a just law that is not always enforced in a just way. This is always the case.

          • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 minutes ago

            Your example ignores the consequences to those accused and convicted which negates the value of using it as your argument.

            The worst someone will suffer from indiscriminate speed ticket enforcement will be a sub $500 fee.

            The worst someone will suffer from indiscriminate “illegal miscarriage” enforcement is prison, loss of livelihood, with the knock-on effect of death of the accused from trying to avoid being charged with the unjust law.

            There’s a drastic difference between those two examples, and trying to use the same brush to paint them the same is counterproductive, wouldn’t you agree?