• Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I’m glad that hearing about how your party is run by dusty old mummies with no credibility bores you. It means you hear it a lot, and you need to.

    • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Naah, it’s not that. It’s that your argument bores me. Because it’s always the same thing- you build your straw man by editing everyone’s words to mean something they’re not at all saying, and then arrogantly pretend to have the upper hand whilst only achieving to prove the point of whoever you’re debating with. Frankly…

      It’s getting old.

      And If this conversation served any purpose, it was to show to anyone who happens to make it this far, that not only are your views on the subject very hypocritical, but that you’re also completely oblivious to it even when it is pointed out to you in plain sight.

      To summarize:

      According to you- age limits need to be placed on everyone but those that align with your ideology.

      According to me- that’s some dangerous gatekeeping that is very reminiscent of someone else that is currently very popular today.

      And having had the opportunity to interact with you here on several occasions, this seems to be a trend for you. Seemingly- the rules should apply only to others, but never you.

      Again, this is very familiar behavior. I just can’t put my finger on who it reminds me of.

      Now, go on and have your gotcha moment and bring up that I had said “we’re done here” in your obsessive need to have the last word. My experience with you has shown that there’s no possible outcome in which a conversation with you can end otherwise. And do be sure to accuse me of stalking you if I ever happen to respond to any comment you make within the next few days or so.