lysdexic@programming.dev to Programming@programming.devEnglish · 2 months agoMistakes engineers make in large established codebaseswww.seangoedecke.comexternal-linkmessage-square19fedilinkarrow-up153arrow-down12cross-posted to: lobsters
arrow-up151arrow-down1external-linkMistakes engineers make in large established codebaseswww.seangoedecke.comlysdexic@programming.dev to Programming@programming.devEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square19fedilinkcross-posted to: lobsters
minus-squareBrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·2 months agoIt’s been the hardest thing for me to instill good testing practices in devs. In a function with 23 paths devs usually burnout and only do 9 or 10. Most never consider that making the function smaller is an option.
minus-squareprojectmoon@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 months ago1 scenario tested is better than 0 tested.
It’s been the hardest thing for me to instill good testing practices in devs. In a function with 23 paths devs usually burnout and only do 9 or 10. Most never consider that making the function smaller is an option.
1 scenario tested is better than 0 tested.