hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone to memes@lemmy.world · 2 years agoA bit latelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square158fedilinkarrow-up128arrow-down116file-text
arrow-up112arrow-down1imageA bit latelemmy.blahaj.zonehungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone to memes@lemmy.world · 2 years agomessage-square158fedilinkfile-text
minus-squaredeaf_fish@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·2 years agoWhy? The sign seems fine to me.
minus-squareKedly@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoBecause thereal’s version is welcoming and non discriminatory, and the meme is antagonistic by design
minus-squaredeaf_fish@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·2 years agoYes, it is antagonistic. But is it bad to be antagonistic to people who think that men’s feelings are more important that women’s safety?
minus-squareKedly@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoYeah, ok, with this response and your other one, I’m blocking you now
Why? The sign seems fine to me.
Because thereal’s version is welcoming and non discriminatory, and the meme is antagonistic by design
Yes, it is antagonistic. But is it bad to be antagonistic to people who think that men’s feelings are more important that women’s safety?
Yeah, ok, with this response and your other one, I’m blocking you now