The first one is a lie. Just so much was going on he couldn’t stop the republicans from going forward with leaded gas
The second one doesn’t make and sense. They werent fighting for HIV help when HIV wasn’t a problem. We’ll yeah it wasn’t a problem yet! But once it actually became a problem the democrats were pretty quick to try to jump to help before the 80s was over. Being mainly held back by, yup, Republicans.
And the last one just makes you an asshole. How dare democrats have some patriotism after the biggest attack on the country. Literally most everyone was for the war at first, and if you weren’t you were anti American. And who spread the sentiment around? You know it was Republicans. After the wave of blind patriotism was over who was opposed to the Iraqi invasion?
From the article you posted
on Meet the Press in 2007, Biden defended his false claims about Iraqi WMDs by falsely insisting that “everyone in the world thought he had them. The weapons inspectors said he had them.”
So when Bush (a Republican) pushed for the war, it was pretty controversial to go against it cause you were pretty un patriotic. But did the majority of democrats vote for it any way? No! The vote was 296-133
126 democrats, 6 republicans, and one independent voted against it. So, it seems again the democrats were on the “better” side.
It’s not the democrats who are doing the tests and saying it wasn’t from a lab; it is scientists. Democrats are just saying the scientists are right
Republicans themselves are calling themselves scientists and saying it was from a lab.
See the difference yet?
Stop peddling conspiracy theories.
Right we should just listen to bad actors unquestionably, it’s working out great for Maga.
It’s not the democrats saying it. It’s scientists. Democrats are just saying to listen to scientists.
Are you really this dense?
And big oil paid scientists for years to claim lead in gasoline was fine actually and the government nodded along in agreement.
Or that AIDS wasn’t that bad because it csn only effect homosexuals.
Or that there were WMDs in Iraq.
Sorry there’s plenty of reasons to question govt narratives.
And all those lies were peddled by the same side that says the virus started in a lab
Thank you for proving me more correct
The democrats didn’t argue with any of those
Yes they did
They didn’t, FDRs admin pushed leaded gasoline (though his presidency was obviously good in many other ways)
Most democrats didn’t push for HIV/AIDS research and funding until many years after it became clearly an issue.
And https://truthout.org/articles/democrats-share-the-blame-for-tragedy-of-iraq-war/ most didn’t argue with the reasoning for the Iraq War.
The first one is a lie. Just so much was going on he couldn’t stop the republicans from going forward with leaded gas
The second one doesn’t make and sense. They werent fighting for HIV help when HIV wasn’t a problem. We’ll yeah it wasn’t a problem yet! But once it actually became a problem the democrats were pretty quick to try to jump to help before the 80s was over. Being mainly held back by, yup, Republicans.
And the last one just makes you an asshole. How dare democrats have some patriotism after the biggest attack on the country. Literally most everyone was for the war at first, and if you weren’t you were anti American. And who spread the sentiment around? You know it was Republicans. After the wave of blind patriotism was over who was opposed to the Iraqi invasion?
From the article you posted
So when Bush (a Republican) pushed for the war, it was pretty controversial to go against it cause you were pretty un patriotic. But did the majority of democrats vote for it any way? No! The vote was 296-133
126 democrats, 6 republicans, and one independent voted against it. So, it seems again the democrats were on the “better” side.
But keep acting like they’re the same.