• killingspark@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think the whole point was that a female gaze is just way less developed because they aren’t typically the ones observing but the ones being observed. At least that’s what I got from reading the article

        • killingspark@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          That’s actually something the article talks about. According to the article, assuming women have that “gaze” because men do is the core of the misunderstanding.

            • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              Yep, it’s pretty weird to go from “women generally want different things” to pretending women don’t find some people visually attractive. They were trying to frame the male gaze as a symptom of the patriarchy but not doing a great job of it.