It’s happening again.

  • Ledericas@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    7 hours ago

    this might be enough for people to switch phones to android, you dont mess with peoples addiction to games.

    • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Fortnite hasn’t been on iOS for like 5 years already at this point, anyone who was going to change ecosystem because of Fortnite is long gone.

      There are so many platforms that Fortnite is on that it not being on iOS isn’t an actual issue.

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      They’ll be right back unless they’re downright chemically addicted. Android is a shovelware trash operating system.

      Like for expample the Bluetooth quick tile sorting by most recently paired Instead of most recently connected (and no its not rearrangeable without re-pairing devices)

      • fluxx1@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Wow, what a short-sighted view. Android, despite its many shortcomings, gives you orders of magnitude more freedom in almost every way imaginable. And none of its shortcomings are blocking you from using it, rather more or less annoy you.

  • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    4 hours ago

    their iPhone is preventing them from playing the game

    Epic are the ones preventing Fortnite from being available on iPhones. They have no one to blame but themselves for the way they planned to intentionally break the App Store rules and had a lawsuit ready to go when it was rightly removed from the store.

    They fucked around and found out.

    • 0xD@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Lol, siding with apple here is a bootlicker thing to do.

      • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        You guys need to find a new name to call people.

        Epic were the bad guys in this scenario. Why are you licking the boot of epic?

  • ThePantser@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Keep it up Apple, keep pissing off the gamers. Shrink that monopoly. Seems pretty fucking insane that they can stop an app from working remotely. If an app that is being used to coordinate a rebellion takes off the US government can order Apple to disable its use. I hope the degoogling Android trend takes off further.

    • kayazere@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      If an app that is being used to coordinate a rebellion takes off the US government can order Apple to disable its use. I hope the degoogling Android trend takes off further.

      Apple already did this in Hong Kong to appease China. They took down apps that were used by protesters to coordinate, they even modified AirDrop so it couldn’t be easily used for ad hoc communication.

      https://9to5mac.com/2025/03/17/apple-globally-censoring-this-iphone-communication-feature-deserves-renewed-scrutiny/

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Imagine if now, at the height of their success, Apple finally decided, for the first time, to alienate the core audience they’ve always shown undying dedication to: gamers /s

    • MisterMoo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      They targeted gamers.

      Gamers.

      We’re a group of people who will sit for hours, days, even weeks on end performing some of the hardest, most mentally demanding tasks. Over, and over, and over all for nothing more than a little digital token saying we did.

      We’ll punish our selfs doing things others would consider torture, because we think it’s fun.

      We’ll spend most if not all of our free time min maxing the stats of a fictional character all to draw out a single extra point of damage per second.

      Many of us have made careers out of doing just these things: slogging through the grind, all day, the same quests over and over, hundreds of times to the point where we know evety little detail such that some have attained such gamer nirvana that they can literally play these games blindfolded.

      Do these people have any idea how many controllers have been smashed, systems over heated, disks and carts destroyed 8n frustration? All to latter be referred to as bragging rights?

      These people honestly think this is a battle they can win? They take our media? We’re already building a new one without them. They take our devs? Gamers aren’t shy about throwing their money else where, or even making the games our selves. They think calling us racist, mysoginistic, rape apologists is going to change us? We’ve been called worse things by prepubescent 10 year olds with a shitty head set. They picked a fight against a group that’s already grown desensitized to their strategies and methods. Who enjoy the battle of attrition they’ve threatened us with. Who take it as a challange when they tell us we no longer matter. Our obsession with proving we can after being told we can’t is so deeply ingrained from years of dealing with big brothers/sisters and friends laughing at how pathetic we used to be that proving you people wrong has become a very real need; a honed reflex.

      Gamers are competative, hard core, by nature. We love a challange. The worst thing you did in all of this was to challange us. You’re not special, you’re not original, you’re not the first; this is just another boss fight.

    • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      GaMeRs aren’t going to do shit to Apple lol. Fortnite hasn’t been on iPhones for years and Apple hasn’t been hurt one bit.

      If an app that is being used to coordinate a rebellion takes off the US government can……

      lol

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      17 hours ago

      It’s actually Epic’s fault this time. They pulled it from the EU app store.

  • woelkchen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    14 hours ago

    People buying Apple products want to be told by Apple what’s allowed. The walled garden is core to Apple’s product philosophy. It’s not like everybody was expecting Apple to be super open and inclusive with anything and then be taken by surprise from the Fortnite situation. Even before they deprecated open standards because their own tech is supposedly evolving faster and are better integrated.

    People wanting to play Fortnite on phones can just get a reasonably specced Android phone and install EGS next to Play Store with just a few taps.

    • theherk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      People buying Apple products want to be told by Apple what’s allowed.

      I get that this crowd generally thinks Apple is hellspawn, in spite of also having devices made by other, also shitty corporations, but this is just a dumb thing to say. They’re just devices. Yes some of us prefer them. I didn’t switch after every mainline Android phone from G1 through Nexus and Pixel because I wanted a paternal imposition of allowed apps. Stupid fucking comment.

      • 0xD@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        No, apple is a piece of shit for not allowing you to flash whatever firmware you want on there. It makes my job harder and no one wants to do ios pentesting because of that.

        I hope that apple burns to hell.

        • theherk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 minutes ago

          I don’t disagree with any of that. I only take issue with the quoted statement.

    • CriticalMiss@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      41
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Eh, not really. I buy Apple because I’ve had 3 Android phones crap out on me literally days after their warranty died. I got tired of that shit, I paid a bit more and got myself an iPhone 13. It still works as good as it did on the first day. While I do know that Apple devices have a set death day (when they stop getting security updates), I believe I generate far less e-waste by buying 1 iPhone every 7 or 8 years instead of buying a brand new Android every year.

      As far as Fortnite goes, I don’t care for the game itself, but I am happy that they fought Apple in court and gave developers the freedom to implement third party IAP, albeit I have no use for it as I only use my phone for phone calls and messaging and the occasional web browsing.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        What a disingenuous arguement.

        You said you paid more for an iPhone, which means you were buying cheap Android phones and then complaining that they don’t last. Well yeah, because they’re cheap.

        You can buy Android phones that make iPhones look like the budget option if you want to, I’m not advising it but it’s possible.

        • mrvictory1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I’d say even cheap Androids can last long: Samsung A series receive 4 OS updates and after updates are over, you can get a few more years with last supported OS until battery or app compatibility becomes a problem.

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        Android is an operating system. It has nothing to do with crappy hardware. At least they’re somewhat repairable when they do break.

      • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I had a MacBook, while I was typing on it, suddenly just turn off, never to be turned on again. Took it to the store, they told me it was cheaper to buy a new one.

      • bork@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        buying a brand new android every year

        We’ve had wildly different experiences with these companies, for what it’s worth.

        I bought an iPhone X back when they were new, and had to get it replaced twice within the first 6 months because of hardware failures.

        Conversely, I kept my Pixel 3 (from 2019) until last year.

        • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          That’s how stuff works. Different people have different experiences. I had to get my pixel 3 replaced twice under warranty for a known screen issue. The pixel 7a, believe it is, is currently in the middle of a mass battery failure issue that really should end in a recall, where they’re refunding people often more than they even paid for the phone when it happens. Every flagship pixel up until the 5 had major hardware issues.

          iPhones have, historically, been the best phones you could get in terms of being built to last, which is also why Apple have such long software support for them.

        • _____@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          32
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Predicting a classic tale of comparing apple flagships to $150 android phones.

  • Zak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    The DMA should never have allowed Apple any oversight of apps distributed outside their store.

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I don’t think this is distributed outside their store, flashlight man.

      • Zak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Epic was planning to distribute it in its own store in the EU.

        flashlight man.

        I’ll take it.

  • AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Epic isn’t wrong about Apples payment requirements being BS, but Epic also isn’t exactly a hero here.

    Will be interesting to see how this pissing match plays out over time.

    Should you be able to use other payment providers outside of apple pay YES!

    Should you be able to install other APP stores on an iPhone? Not sure.

    • middlemanSI@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Why shouldn’t you be able to install whatever you want? Maybe I’m missing something…

      • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        You’re missing that you don’t make the OS, and the OS maker doesn’t have to make a way for you to be able to install whatever you want. Sony doesn’t let you install Switch games on your PS5, do they? Should they be forced to?

      • AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        24
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I am in the camp that there is a benefit to the managed store. Since moving family members to iOS devices the number of times they have loaded malware or asked me for help installing ANYTHING dropped to zero.

        Should techies be able to side load if they want? Sure, should that be a primary install method? No.

        • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 hours ago

          There’s a lot of very techy people who’ve never had to do family tech support on this platform.

          Yes, the fact that Mum can’t accidentally install a shitty browser toolbar is a feature.

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          There is a benefit. And you can continue using the first-party store if you want. There’s no benefit to not being able to use 3rd-party ones to anyone but Apple and their investors.

        • FreeBooteR69@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          35
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago

          All bootloaders should be able to be unlocked and able to install the OS of your choice. Also you should be able to choose whatever app store you want. It is your hardware, you payed for it.

          • 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            17
            ·
            edit-2
            16 hours ago

            If you want a customizable phone, yes. If you want a secured phone, no.

            There are already existing products for both sides. No point in forcing them to do something else at this point.

            • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              16 hours ago

              Except Google is trying to limit this on Android phones as well (e.g. with SafetyNet).

              If manufacturers had their way, there wouldn’t be any phones for one side.

              • Zak@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                16 hours ago

                If manufacturers had their way, there wouldn’t be any phones for one side.

                There’s nothing stopping manufacturers from permanently locking the bootloader. Some do and others don’t suggesting that the industry does not have a universal preference.

                I do think Google wants it to be inconvenient enough to run a version of Android they haven’t blessed as one’s main phone that it has no chance to become mainstream, but that’s about the prospect of an OEM not bundling Google’s apps and store, not hobbyists running custom builds. If that sounds like an attempt to use market power to exclude competitors in violation of fair trading laws in a multitude of jurisdictions, you might be on to something.

                • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  16 hours ago

                  There’s nothing stopping manufacturers from permanently locking the bootloader. Some do and others don’t suggesting that the industry does not have a universal preference.

                  Some manufacturers have stopped allowing unlocking their bootloaders, some bootloaders have been hacked by the community. It’s not like this is a static system.

                  I do think Google wants it to be inconvenient enough to run a version of Android they haven’t blessed as one’s main phone that it has no chance to become mainstream, but that’s about the prospect of an OEM not bundling Google’s apps and store, not hobbyists running custom builds.

                  No, Google is also trying to stop hobbyists running custom builds from accessing services built on their software (the aforementioned SafetyNet). Hackers keep finding ways around this, but Google keeps trying to lock them out.

              • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                16 hours ago

                I mean that’s something that’d happen regardless of whether you may install other App Stores on an iPhone easily, no?

                • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  16 hours ago

                  GP wrote:

                  All bootloaders should be able to be unlocked and able to install the OS of your choice. Also you should be able to choose whatever app store you want. It is your hardware, you payed for it.

                  App stores are just one part of the puzzle. Unless consumers actually have rights, manufacturers will keep trying to limit their options.

        • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          16 hours ago

          Nope. No reason that you should pay $1000 for a device and not, at the very least, be able to install compatible software from other sources.

          We wouldn’t accept this from Microsoft. Could you imagine if this was the norm for DOS or Windows?

          Should side loading be discouraged and warned about? Yes. Should it be impossible? Maybe through “parental” controls or MDM, but absolutely not out-of-the-box.

          • orgrinrt@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            This is a sane take, though I personally do generally tend towards understanding and even valuing the walled garden to some degree. But this is what I’ve always felt underneath it, you found the words.

        • noride@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          17 hours ago

          “I frequently interface with idiots, so I don’t feel it would be safe for you to have full control over the hardware you own.”

        • middlemanSI@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          17 hours ago

          I can see benefits of such limitations for say a company-owned devices with cyber-security in mind. When we talk about open market of devices in an increasingly “digital” world I am against limitations with profit in mind. It’s like many things in life. When you want to do or use something you have to learn to use it, often by getting burned or otherwise making a mistake. You having to fix family devices has nothing to do with it. Anyway I have no stake in this, I would never buy an Apple device. Companies pushing for “infinite growth” with such policies will be left in the dust imo, but the billionares will just move on after milking everything dry.