- cross-posted to:
- ghazi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
- cross-posted to:
- ghazi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/26082031
The house style of the New York Times is severely outdated. Depending on the topic, the newspaper’s purportedly impartial tone instead reads as smug, self-amused, and deeply lazy. The results are disastrous when applied to a recent article which sincerely considers the idea that Rachel Griffin-Accurso, the popular children’s entertainer known as Ms. Rachel, might […]
Archived version without paywall: https://archive.is/yE3mF
People seem to have either forgot or just not know the NYT has always had a neocon, jingoist, America BEST superiority complex when it comes to anything approaching ‘foreign policy’.
Does… everyone remember when they spent a whole lot of time amplifying the Bush admin’s bogus claims and outright lies justifying the GWOT, Iraq invasion 2 electric boogaloo?
Hyped up the ‘threat’ from Iran, to functionally make Obama and the Dems seem weak on foreign policy?
And that’s just in my lifetime…
Any whoosie, I’m sure that’s all just a coincidence and is in no way related to the CIA’s vast, documented history of involvement in and manipulation of US domestic media publications.
My grandfather used to half-jokingly call them the CIA’s press wing.
Snowden and Assange aren’t half joking about it.
Judith Miller sucks.
From Wikipedia:
The story is decent enough but holy shit the comments on that link are cancer