The New York Times Really Asked Ms. Rachel If She's Paid By Hamas | Defector
defector.com
The house style of the New York Times is severely outdated. Depending on the topic, the newspaper’s purportedly impartial tone instead reads as smug, self-amused, and deeply lazy. The results are disastrous when applied to a recent article which sincerely considers the idea that Rachel Griffin-Accurso, the popular children’s entertainer known as Ms. Rachel, might […]

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/26082031

The house style of the New York Times is severely outdated. Depending on the topic, the newspaper’s purportedly impartial tone instead reads as smug, self-amused, and deeply lazy. The results are disastrous when applied to a recent article which sincerely considers the idea that Rachel Griffin-Accurso, the popular children’s entertainer known as Ms. Rachel, might […]

Archived version without paywall: https://archive.is/yE3mF

  • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    161·
    21 hours ago

    That article is bullshit

    https://archive.ph/fmFeS

    There’s the NYT article about Ms. Rachel. Nowhere in there do they accuse her of being funded by Hamas, they just soft-peddle the agitator group that DID accuse her.

    Standard mayo sandwich bullshit, but they never even talked to Ms. Rachel, so how could they “ask her if she’s paid by hamas”?