• Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      They’re basically copying Samsung (and the auto industry) and switching to using the year of the release instead of iterative naming schemes.

    • Scoopta@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Looks like they’re jumping from 15 to 26, in fact they’re doing the same thing for iOS, jumping from 18 to 26 for the next release. Looks like they’re synchronizing all their OS version numbers using the year they’ll be primarily used(i.e. 2026) from what I can find.

      • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        This is my preferred versioning format for user-facing software, by far.

        I feel like Semver should also adopt the date inclusion, like 7.4.2-202606 or even 7.4.202606 — you can even extended it to multiple daily releases like 7.4.20260610.1233

        There’s too much software to mentally track when each version was released. You should be able to tell at a glance.

      • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I’m not an apple person, so even I saw news about iOS I thought “how the fuck are they on 26 already?”

        I didn’t really care, but I appreciate the explanation.

        • Scoopta@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Tbh I’m not an apple person either. The comment about macOS being on 26 caught my eye and I went and did some research.