• DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The basic cycle of mass extinction is that an organism becomes too successful and breaks the ecosystem in ways that more complex life has trouble surviving.

    So, yeah, an intelligent species has to prove itself capable of self control to not destroy its own environment or at least capable enough to spread before it does.

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Mother nature made us more clever than other animals but didn’t give us any additional wisdom. So we destroy our environment and overshoot our population the same as any other species.

    Too bad our environment is ‘everywhere.’ Perhaps nature wanted to commit suicide and so spawned us.

    • Doom@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      nature will be fine. when you really think about it the planet is just beget by the stars so like are we really that important? probably just one of a thousand attempts across the universe.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    Rich White People: “Humans are simply incapable of self-governance. They are too violent, too prone to conflict, too hell bent on self-obliteration. I suppose we are doomed as a species to exterminate ourselves and all other life surrounding us.”

    Every Other Socio-Economic Group: “STAHP! PLEASE STAHP!!!”

    • Signtist@bookwormstory.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Those aren’t mutually exclusive, though. Even if 99.9% of a species fits in perfectly with the environment, if that last little sliver destroys everything, and the rest of the species is unable and/or unwilling to stop them, then we destroy everything anyway. Sure, it may not be ALL humans, but it’s still humans.

    • peteyestee@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Please see: street kids playing the game and hustling for money. It’s the same exact strategy as businessmen. The same game. It’s all the same from the bottom to the top, and these shitty rappers have people sucking their dick about struggle when they are doing the same manipulative things as the rich people.

      Kill yourself, or go to war against it before you ever play that game.

      Selling meth, crack and H, or pimping and trafficking is just as shitty as being a crooked cop making side money or a corrupt politician or businessman. Where were they when there were protests against cops? In 2020 they proved they are bitch and down for nothing but money. Not only that but when you understand how all that shit works, you know regular people use them, they are basically used by feds to do the dirty work the feds can’t legally do.

    • PattyMcB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Love of money is the root of all evil.

      In reality, it’s more like unfettered greed of certain people

      • kautau@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I would say that psychologically it’s the addiction of power. We toe the line where “competition” creates the dopamine release of “being better than others.”

        Yet for some that means it’s never enough. Richest person in the world? Need to take over government. Most powerful world leader? Need to assert myself even more.

        I think the great filter often boils down to unnecessary competition. In the short term it leads to technological strides, but in the long term it becomes a species self-harm, and perhaps broader. A good theoretical example is

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remembrance_of_Earth’s_Past

        Tap for spoiler

        Every species that exists within that series is so focused on ensuring they have the most power that they will go out of their way to annihilate any other species due to the assumption that’s what all of them will do is seek more power. Ironically considering the scientific and technological capabilities of the involved parties, they may have been able to work together towards a better outcome than “anyone who isn’t me is my enemy” which is basically universal fascism.

        • PattyMcB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          I’ve been floating the idea that evolution is the ultimate culprit. Add intelligence to “most prolific, genetically” and get capitalism, then late stage capitalism in our technological age, and viola…

          I’ve been told I’m insane, though, so take it with a grain of salt

    • Chris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Money is just paper. Now it’s just bits on a disk.

      The human need to acquire I think is the problem.

        • Mesophar@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          24 minutes ago

          They are saying it is more general than money or information, that those are power but those specifically are not special. If we had a society without money, something else would occupy the same purpose of the psychological need of humans “to get more” to be on top.

          They aren’t saying “money isn’t important to that”, they are saying “money isn’t important to that”.

    • entwine413@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      It’s actually type b personally disorders. Without them, capitalism couldn’t exist.

    • storm@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Power not money. Government, patriarchy, racism, and their ilk all drive people in similarly destructive ways, money is just the (highly visible) common language.

  • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Nah.

    We might end up back at cave dwellers with cancers that kills us at 30, but we’ll maintain a local presence.

    A filter doesn’t prevent life on earth continuing, it just stops it contaminating outter space.

    • memfree@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      But the point of Fermi’s Paradox is that we are not seeing evidence of alien intelligence anywhere. We don’t expect it here on earth, but we look out in space and see no light/radio/other waves that look like messages; no energy bursts or other anomalies that don’t have better explainations (though some have no explaination at all). The Great Filter is simply a hypothesis – like the Dark Forest – as to why we don’t see evidence of intelligent life in space.

      If we went back to caves, we’d have great-filtered ourselves.

    • Eheran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Cancer never killed people young in relevant quantities, that is a big reason why we never evolved to get rid of it to begin with: We already have old kids by the time it causes trouble. The same way getting another set of teeth never evolved. Or generally getting far older.