cheese_greater@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · edit-21 day agoDo you ever revise your upvotes for a particular sub-thread/conversant when you get the sense they are either bad-faith or do not have sufficient knowledge to justify their participation or comments?message-squaremessage-square20fedilinkarrow-up172arrow-down13
arrow-up169arrow-down1message-squareDo you ever revise your upvotes for a particular sub-thread/conversant when you get the sense they are either bad-faith or do not have sufficient knowledge to justify their participation or comments?cheese_greater@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · edit-21 day agomessage-square20fedilink
minus-squarejet@hackertalks.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-21 day agoIf I think the content is a net positive for Lemmy you get a upvote, even if I disagree, even if I don’t like you. So that means even if someone later reveals themselves to be an asshat, they are still adding to Lemmy’s ecosystem and get to keep their upvotes. Update: but I’m not a saint, if someone is downvoting me I’ll downvote them right back
If I think the content is a net positive for Lemmy you get a upvote, even if I disagree, even if I don’t like you.
So that means even if someone later reveals themselves to be an asshat, they are still adding to Lemmy’s ecosystem and get to keep their upvotes.
Update: but I’m not a saint, if someone is downvoting me I’ll downvote them right back