• DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    Oh look, a company that bought your “non personally identifiable” personal data and is now using it against you to determine how much it can get away with overcharging you.

    That’s the “innovation” that anti-privacy lobbyists say personal data protection laws would stifle.

    • cubism_pitta@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      Isn’t it great?!

      I love innovation.

      All that aside, how do they intend to prove that their per customer pricing is not biased?

      Its actually amusing as I was listing out potential biases… I couldn’t actually see how it wouldn’t be.

      • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I think bias isn’t the right word to use here. Discrimination should be more appropriate.

        • cubism_pitta@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Yes, it’s going to be biased by design.

          You are correct, I can’t think of a way that it wouldn’t also be discriminatory.

          Thanks friend

          • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Not all discrimination is illegal, if that’s the direction y’all were thinking. IDK how it works if it indirectly discriminates against something like race or sex though.

            • cubism_pitta@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 hours ago

              My point is that this would wind up breaking things along racial, gender, religious lines inadvertently (at best).