• Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      Every criticism presented is completely true. She would have been better than trump, but she was a terrible Democratic candidate. She would have made a better Republican candidate. Her campaign would only needed to have focused on her prosecutorial career.

      • Jumbie@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Hope the next election (if there is one) goes your way and the candidate is perfect.

        • piefood@feddit.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago
          • supports a genocide
          • supports torture programs
          • supports increasing military and intelligence funding
          • supports deporting innocent people
          • supports a highly unpopular president
          • runs on highly unpopular policies

          I think you might have a skewed definitions of what “perfect” means. I think most people would settle for “not a monster” but that’s too high of a bar for the DNC.

        • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          That, but unironically.

          Winning a presidential election isn’t about the votes that are cast. It’s about the voters that stay home. It’s really difficult to get people to the polls when your entire platform is “a little less evil than the other guy.”.

          I voted for the lesser evil, and I know why so many did not. You do us no favors by refusing to recognize that the lesser evil is still evil.