• DFX4509B@lemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    This is ‘GM in 2008’ all over again.

    (because a company that’s ‘too big to fail’ has been bailed out by the government before)

    • FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      would you rather they fail and you get no chips, or higher prices because less competition? this isn’t technically a bad thing…

      • basketugly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Intel would be an example of a chipmaker that should fail but they won’t let it because it’s also an unofficial asset. It will literally never fail no matter how backward it gets and they have been backward for decades.

      • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I mean, it’s not definitely a bad thing in principle… But given the current administration, I would worry about any company the government wants to get their hands into. I’d be worried if the us suddenly wanted to buy into Coca-Cola… But Intel is scarier.