• BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    My experience with AI so far is that I have to waste more time fine tuning my prompt to get what I want and still end up with some obvious issues that I have to manually fix and the only way I would know about these issues is my prior experience which I will stop gaining if I start depending on AI too much, plus it creates unrealistic expectations from employers on execution time, it’s the worst thing that has happened to the tech industry, I hate my career now and just want to switch to any boring but stable low paying job if I don’t have to worry about going through months for a job hunt

    • boor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Similar experience here. I recently took the official Google “prompting essentials” course. I kept an open mind and modest expectations; this is a tool that’s here to stay. Best to just approach it as the next Microsoft Word and see how it can add practical value.

      The biggest thing I learned is that getting quality outputs will require at least a paragraph-long, thoughtful prompt and 15 minutes of iteration. If I can DIY in less than 30 minutes, the LLM is probably not worth the trouble.

      I’m still trying to find use cases (I don’t code), but it often just feels like a solution in search of a problem….

    • Lucky_777@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Sounds like we all just wamt to retire as goat farmers. Just like before. The more things change…they say