• Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      I’m glad I voted for Harris and I’m not complicit in shipping someone’s family member to a concentration camp or helping a pedophile get elected.

      Some would argue this as a bad move, but considering Gaza will be a parking lot by December anyway, congrats, benchwarmers. You played yourselves.

      • ORbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        I’m with you. We can’t know if she would have taken a different stance on this, but at least we wouldn’t have a mugshot hanging from buildings in the capital where martial law has been instituted.

    • AWistfulNihilist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      Currently democrats are having a registration crisis while Republicans are having a boom, so pretty good?

      Like you’d think those numbers would be opposite, maybe they are a continued indictment of the DNC democratic party that continues to ignore any candidate who has organic support like Mamdami.

        • bss03@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          5 days ago

          I think voting for a D in the general is generally a good harm reduction strategy. That said, I’m a big fan of the Working Families Party, tho they aren’t active where I’m at. They seem to be “more practical” at gaining political power, while still fairly well-aligned with the DSA about how it should be used.

          I, too, started looking for something “left” of the DNC in 2016; I was a fan of Bernie [and other progressives].

      • FatCrab@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 days ago

        I was just listening to an explanation of this effectively fake bit of information this morning. Basically, at least in MA and other states like it, both dems and republicans saw a drop in registration because registrations work differently now. Where registrations are automatic, they don’t default to a party affiliation and you have to actively select such, which most people aren’t going to do. As a result, an absolutely enormous proportion of registrations are now unaffiliated and BOTH parties are more or less taking a hit–however, because Dems get more registrations historically anyway and many of those are now no longer going in to register just party affiliation, they seem disproportionately hit. End of the day, not much is really changing that we can understand from the voting registrations, but we’ll see what happens in the midterms.

        • AWistfulNihilist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Oh interesting, i haven’t heard that fluffy little bit of cope. Every publication I’ve seen that’s covering the initial NYT drop is confirming the results from 4 years of data and they have a dozen bullet points of explanation.

          But I haven’t heard that very comfy sounding one yet, you have the podcast link or article i can dig into?

          • FatCrab@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            This was discussed in the latest episode of the Horse Race. It’s a MA politics and news podcast so that was their focus. I’ve no idea how this relates to other states

    • resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      Given that democrats are going along with fascism and throwing progressives under the bus after the primary, vindicating.