If you don’t support what happened to Charlie, you are a bad person who allowed the world to get like this. The fact is that some people need to not be here.
That’s the same thing. Don’t feel bad about it. These people know the kind of damage they are doing. They know their hateful rhetoric kills. How many people do you think Charlie Kirk convinced to kill someone? Trans deaths are very rarely reported as such. And, the reasons aren’t really documented anywhere for reporting
If the intentional message that you are saying on a public platform convince people to hate other people based on things that they cannot change about themselves, then you are a bad person and deserve to die.
Some easy examples are gender, sexual orientation, etc.
If you don’t support what happened to Charlie, you are a bad person who allowed the world to get like this. The fact is that some people need to not be here.
I think it’s fair to not support the act, but enjoy the results.
That’s the same thing. Don’t feel bad about it. These people know the kind of damage they are doing. They know their hateful rhetoric kills. How many people do you think Charlie Kirk convinced to kill someone? Trans deaths are very rarely reported as such. And, the reasons aren’t really documented anywhere for reporting
Shooting someone you disagree with is not right. I’m curious who gets to decide who lives or dies in your opinion, and based on which parameters?
If the intentional message that you are saying on a public platform convince people to hate other people based on things that they cannot change about themselves, then you are a bad person and deserve to die.
Some easy examples are gender, sexual orientation, etc.
however, shooting someone who tries to take away the basic rights of others is right. that’s not a disagreement - that’s one side violating the other
you can’t fight intolerance with tolerance