OQB @fajre@lemmy.world

I’ve been thinking about transparency and security in the public sector. Do you think all government software and platforms should be open source?

Some countries have already made progress in this area:

  • Estonia: digital government services with open and auditable APIs.
  • United Kingdom: several open source government projects and systems published on GitHub.
  • France and Canada: policies encouraging the use of free and open source software in public agencies.

Possible benefits:

  • Full transparency: anyone can audit the code, ensuring there is no corruption, hidden flaws, or unauthorized data collection.
  • Enhanced security: public reviews help identify vulnerabilities quickly.
  • Cost reduction: less dependency on private vendors and lower spending on proprietary licenses.
  • Flexibility and innovation: public agencies can adapt systems to their needs without relying on external solutions.

Possible challenges:

  • Maintenance and updating of complex systems.
  • Protecting sensitive data without compromising citizen privacy.
  • Political or bureaucratic resistance to opening the code.

Do you think this could be viable in the governments of your countries? How could we start making this a reality globally?

  • stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 hours ago

    This is due to a simple mental hang up people have.

    They want to blame/punish someone for the failure.

    In an open source project, there isn’t really any one you can fine, GPL clearly states that the software is provided without warranty.

    If you hire a company to make a program for you, you pay them to not only build the program for you, but to also accept liability for errors.

    And that is often far more important to management than if the code is open