Is that amount of time common to walk in places in the world where cars don’t dictate the layout of the community?

Im going to be making this walk tomorrow, no worries, I’m just curious if its normal in other places. Maps says its 1hour15minues for 2.3miles or 3.7Km.

  • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    14 hours ago

    That’s too much for walking. I would take a bike in that case.

    Here’s what I consider common:

    1. Walk 10 minutes to the train station
    2. Get to the city center while scrolling Lemmy on your phone.
    3. Walk in the center to visit some fancy stores. Maybe like 15-20 minutes in one direction.
    4. Buy some specialty coffee, fancy kitchen knives, Bialetti rubber rings or whatever.
    5. Walk back to the station: 15-20 minutes.
    6. Battery is nearly dead, and I forgot to bring a charger with me. I guess I’ll just stare out the window.
    7. Walk back home: 10 min.

    In total, that’s going to be like an hour, but it’s divided into multiple parts. Walking that much in just one direction is something I would prefer to avoid. If the library is a 60 min walk away, that’s the same as like 12 bus stops or 15 minutes while sitting in a bus. BTW that 15 minutes includes walking at both ends of the journey. I would definitely choose public transport over walking in that case.

    If the destination is just 15 minutes walk away from your house, that’s perfectly normal, and not a problem in any way. If it’s like 20 minutes away, I would begin to consider using a bike or maybe even a bus.

    • BussyCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I’m in pretty much the same boat as you

      0-20 minutes is usually walking or up to about 1mi/1.6km After that I usually consider biking up to around 5mi/8km If biking isn’t good due to terrain/parking/activity or any further I would generally rather take some form of public transit

      Alas I live in the U.S. in a non pedestrian friendly area now and the majority of the time the only real option is driving

      • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        I’ve spent some time in a few different environments in Europe. In the city, the walking rule applies, and public transport works well. You don’t really need a car unless you buy ikea furniture frequently. The larger the city, the more you end up hating your car.

        In small towns, the focus shifts towards walking, bicycling and driving your own car. Busses might exist, but just barely. Not something you would consider unless you’re completely out of options. If you live close to the town center, you can walk or bike nearly everywhere, but you usually still need a car for certain things. That’s not really a problem because parking is free and always available everywhere.

        If you’re in a more rural environment, walking is no longer an option, because everything is at least 5 km (about an hour walk) away, usually more like 20-50 km away. Bicycling is an option, but there are no bike lanes. That’s usually not a huge problem since there’s hardly any traffic to bother you. The locals seem to enjoy F1 and rally though, so bare that in mind. Oh, and the wildlife is actively looking for ways to commit suicide using your car, so keep your eyes open while driving.

        So, how is it on the other side of the puddle? I’ve heard all sorts of wild things, and I get the feeling that it’s really different from what I’ve experienced here.