• 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    My parents also said the same thing about electronic music

    “it’s not real music, the computer makes it!”

    every new technology that lowers the barrier of entry gets derided every time. Tale as old as time.

    Every new technology that enables more of the masses to participate will obviously mean more low quality stuff gets made. That doesnt mean the tool is worthless.

    Is there a lot of AI slop art? Of course there is… but i hate these anti-AI extremists (especially concentrated in the fediverse) that reject ANYTHING that has even touched AI to be worthless.

    “oh what a nice picture… wait what? The artist filled in one corner with AI? it’s total trash!”

    • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Counterpoint: previous technologies also enabled people to do what wasn’t possible before. Photography allowed for perfect captures of a place and time. Electronic music can create sounds that no physical instrument can. So far, AI hasn’t made anything “impossible” possible, it only makes what a skilled artist or writer could make but super fast.

      • 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        but super fast.

        that’s already making an “impossible” into a “possible”… and in my books, that’s a useful tool if you take all the value judgements out of it.

    • JesusChristLover420@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      If one brush stroke in a painting were made using the blood of a murdered child as paint, would you treat the entire painting and the artist with suspicion? I would. Maybe a masterpiece could be so good that it would overpower that one act in my subjective evaluation, but it would have to be the masterpiece of a true visionary. I would not be easily persuaded.

      Oil is the blood of the very earth on which we depend to live, so to spill it in the name of art is perhaps a greater crime than to spill human blood. Again, I could be persuaded by a masterpiece to set aside the flaws in its creation, but it would require a certain bar of quality.