“Hey…Crisper.GP…T…think…you’ve mixed up the genes for my ass and…elbows…”
“Oh, you’re totally alright! I apologise about that. 😀”
“Oh, you’re totally alright! I apologise about that. 😀”
Here your ass on your elbow like you asked
To be honest you’re probably better off just making a T-Rex from the start let it eat you and just get it over with.
deleted by creator
What a shame that we have created a world where this will only benefit a wealthy minority.
… or to funny looking specimen. Radioactivity no longer required.
Machine learning sure, but an llm? For anything other then as a module to translate abstract data into words that just seem weird
Well I’m sure you know more than the scientists at Stanford university.
I am not saying i understand it at all. My comment is genuine, not rhetorical.
On the contrary i express that i do not understand this to the point of deeming it strange or weird, triggering my curiosity.
I was hoping someone would chime in an explain how text generator techniques (which i do know alot about) known to have no capacity to use real world reason or logic can be used to help solve dna puzzles unless as a sub module of general machine learning. In which that later case would be within my understanding
I am asking that all the people doing this watch Jurassic Park at least once.
I’ll let experts do their thing, but this kind of thing worries me. I never had “there is no singularity, AI just engineers a generic disease by accident and kills is all” on my bingo.
This is actually an excellent use case for AI. Physics and chemistry as scientific disciplines are lots of complex pattern recognition and manipulation. AI is just a pattern recognition and generation engine, despite what the tech bros and apologists like to tell us.
What these engines generate will ultimately be vetted by experts before it even goes to trials. Scientists don’t just take things on blind faith simply because a robot or even another expert comes up with something; their entire deal is to understand their particular field of study in great detail, after all!
Back in the day, I used to fold proteins at home.
Same
There’s something similar that you can do with categorising stars. Basically they want to map as much of the universe as we can see. We’ve got the photos the problem is is that when you zoom in on a 1 mm by 1 mm patch of sky 1,100,000 new stars appear. It’s going to take a while, even with AI.
You never know you might find a Dyson sphere one day.
Of course the actual moral of Jurassic Park is have a well staffed IT team and not just one random guy who you under pay.
Eh. Read the book first.
This seems irresponsible.
There was an old game from the PlayStation days called Xenogears. There was a population of mutants and monsters in it than came about from fucking with DNA irresponsibly. I’m reminded of that obnoxious rat-man from the Kislev prison.
Lol… people downvoting stanford university
Lemmy is a wild place… left wing maga, i guess
it’s useless hype, “ai could do x one day” is speculation at best
DeepMind’s AlphaFold solved the decades-old protein folding problem, and its results are already being used in drug and vaccine development.
is this what the article talks about?
CRISPR is the tool that lets us precisely edit genes in DNA, which contain the instructions for making proteins. AlphaFold is the AI tool that helped us understand what those edits actually do. It’s the 3D shape of the protein that determines its function - without understanding protein folding, gene editing would be like changing code in a language you don’t fully understand and just hoping it works.
so while not the same, it’s a fairly similar field, it is a safe to assume that similar tools can be used. not yet though, the tool is not ready.
why is there a study for this? other than hype - for “ai”, which this arguably isn’t“ai could do x one day” is speculation at best
AI can do, and has done X already. That’s my point.
It says AI in the title. That’s all information they need. Most people on social media don’t think - they react.
No I doesn’t.
The problem is the term AI has become so broadly used that it’s become meaningless. There is a popular quote about how the quota doesn’t want AI to replace artistic jobs, as if it will. As if generative AI and large language models and projects like this are the same.
When the bubble bursts, (please let it be soon) we’re still going to have all of the science AIs because those are actually useful. What we don’t need is AI girlfriends.
AI-powered
Yes it does.
Yes I know the title has the word AI powered in it. I never claimed otherwise.
No it doesn’t
Yes you did
If you’re going to quote some text quote the actual text because you’ll notice that you’re changing it.
I didn’t say “no it doesn’t” I said “no I doesn’t” which is a different sentence.
Yeees, your obvious typo is totally invalidating my previous statement…
Now that is some bullshit if I’ve ever seen it. Take the loss bro.
I make three claims and your response only fits one of them.
It says AI in the title.
No it doesn’t.
That’s all information they need.
No it doesn’t.
Most people on social media don’t think - they react.
No it doesn’t.
Removed by mod
