• ubergeek@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Until evidence shows otherwise, new matter being created doesnt fit our observations.

    Go prove that wrong! Win yourself a Nobel prize in physics! That’s what science is about!

    • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I do also want to point out that stuff like “The conservation of energy” law, in other words, that energy cannot be created or destroyed, does not hold for our universe with our current models. An expanding universe violates the time-translation symmetry

      This is our current models. This is what our current physics says. And we know it’s incomplete.

      When it comes to scientific predictions, you always, always, need the caveat, “under our current model of”.

    • FishFace@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      18 hours ago

      New matter being created with extremely low probability fits perfectly with our observations.

      • ubergeek@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        A teapot created with out solar system orbiting the sun fits our models, with an extremely low probability.

        However, we dont work on that assumption being true.