• Pencilnoob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Wow thanks! If you like this, on Monday I’m planning to release an update that will let you rewind the viewer all the way back to 1959 and see the first launch of Sputnik. Then let it play forward to today sped up so you can see the growth of satellite counts. Also a new public API to fetch the TLEs from any date. I’m hoping this will let folks do interesting stuff with all that data - maybe AI training or research projects etc.

      • Pencilnoob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        Wow thanks so much!

        Yes, so I’m taking every telescope/radio/radar reading I’m allowed to redistribute and then collecting them into a time series database and fetching the most recent reading for each sat into a text file. That’s the TLE download in the public API. Then I use Rust WASM to propagate those readings into positions that are synced with the viewer time. This allows us to very roughly forecast where they will be for the next couple days.

        It’s cool because it’s too much data to transfer over the network, so we only transfer the most recent reading and then calculate positions live in the browser.

      • Pencilnoob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Green is active, orange is debris or dead sats. When a GEO sat runs out of life / power / fuel the operators are supposed to move it out of the main corridor to make room, so often they are in the same ring but higher or lower

      • piskertariot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        1 day ago

        Your use of the word “dense” there is a little misleading. At the default view the scale of each satelite pixel looks roughly 20km wide.

            • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Hah, if satellites were actually that large… It still wouldn’t actually be a problem. It’s really hard to grasp just how far things are apart up in geostationary orbit, there is a truly immense amount is space. There’s plenty of elbow room for thousands of Rhode Islands floating around up there, no reason to worry about collisions.

    • Vengefu1 Tuna@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      What the fuck, I had no idea we had so many satellites. Also, this site is really cool. Thank you for making this!

      • Pencilnoob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I know it blew my mind too when I first started building this! It’s such a cool project to get to build!

    • Mensh123@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I’d appreciate if I could use your website without advertisement cookies. Would you mind complying with EU cookie law?

      • Pencilnoob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        I’m not familiar, what is the law, that we cannot use authentication cookies or google/twitter analytics cookies?

        • Fifrok@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          22 hours ago

          The ‘cookie’ law is (mainly) the ePrivacy Directive, that requires websites to get a user’s informed, specific, and affirmative consent before storing or accessing non-essential information on their device.

          To comply a website must inform users about their cookie usage (who is using it, why, and how long they are stored, I think) and allow users to easily withdraw their consent at any time (though there’s no requirement to easily decline).

          Actualy looking at the site, it already might be? I’m not sure, I don’t remember the specifics of the law. But there is a banner pop up and you do inform cookies are used and why, and there’s an easy way to withdraw consent.

          • Pencilnoob@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Yeah that’s what my one guy said was enough at the time, and we’ve got some European partners who never brought it up, so maybe it’s good enough with the banner?

    • fdnomad@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Thats so cool! Looks loke the most popular orbit aligns with the equator. Why is the wider “belt” around that line going over and under? Like

           .
          ..
         ...
      ------
      ...
      ..
      .
      

      You know what I mean?

      • sleep_deprived@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        Making an educated guess as a layperson, besides some satellites that are geosynchronous but not geostationary, I’d assume those are primarily old geostationary satellites in graveyard orbits - when they’re EOL, satellites in those orbits are supposed to perform a small boost out of them, usually adding a few hundred km to their orbit’s radius (GEO is about 36,000km in altitude, so a few hundred km is relatively small). Then, without station keeping, I believe they should naturally precess around the Laplace plane, which will range between roughly Earth’s equator and the ecliptic plane (the plane of Earth’s orbit). At GEO altitudes the Laplace plane is about 7.2 degrees inclined from the equator. I believe that would mean, starting at the equator with an inclination of 0 degrees, these satellites should precess to about 14.4 degrees and back to 0 over several decades (excluding other perturbations, of course).

        I found this online which would seem to confirm at least the mechanics: https://amostech.com/TechnicalPapers/2013/Orbital_Debris/ROSENGREN.pdf