Curious where others might stand.

My day to day “coding” is reviewing, revising and running plans against LLM/code-assistant tools. I juggle around 2-3 sessions of this on various features or tasks at a time.

  • ALERT@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    if you ever vibecoded, you’d know, that using an agent doesn’t mean you accept every suggestion. it does not also mean you edit the suggestions. it means you continue guiding the agent until it comes up with a “perfect” solution that may even be accepted without any edits. so if you are a good “prompter”, given a good model you can be very very efficient without writing even a line of code. does this mean you can be replaced by the said model? absolutely not.

    • tyler@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      lol if that were true then yes there absolutely are replaceable by anything that can ensure they’re getting the right requirements. Of course it isn’t true, because LLMs are nowhere near the level of actual proper development standards but here we are.