Curious where others might stand.

My day to day “coding” is reviewing, revising and running plans against LLM/code-assistant tools. I juggle around 2-3 sessions of this on various features or tasks at a time.

  • etchinghillside@reddthat.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is about the same behavior I’m accustomed to. I will say that my current work is more greenfield at the moment.

    First plan is about 60% there. And then we have a few iterations to get that in good shape.

    Once the plan is together I send that to a virtual machine to implement the code with low/no supervision.

    Then it goes into a draft PR that I will review and provide further guidance on changes or updates. Those iterations will happen on either my virtual or local machine, depending on how much the work is.

    I could imagine It would be pretty difficult with hardware, where you have to compile, and potentially transfer to a chip to run or test further. But I will say, if you can give an LLM access to the whole loop of write, compile, test and reading error logs the results can sometimes be impressive.

    • Flamekebab@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      I don’t think that’d be much good when the way the specs are written are not based purely on technical merits. We also aren’t paid to test hardware - we have hardware because we develop software to test hardware on. Knowing how to navigate those waters is the key skill. Once I’ve got a solution that’ll work getting it implemented is relatively trivial as our approach is extremely atomic.

      In general what you describe sounds like a tremendous amount more overhead than we currently have for little to no gain. What I could do with is a few more engineers that I could train up to have sufficient contextual knowledge, not another junior to babysit. I trained one up and he’s tremendously useful - apart from when he leans too heavily on LLMs. That cost a side project two months of unnecessary faff and sapped team morale massively in the process. I ended up dragging the damn thing over the finish line after he refactored it into something that was exhausting to work with.

      • etchinghillside@reddthat.comOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Gotcha – I have no doubts that LLMs can steer things to shit at breakneck speeds.

        I certainly wouldn’t mind some more (competent) employees.