• SuperDuper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    I find it suspicious that it was the exact amount of votes needed, all of whom just happen to not be up for reelection next year. Feels like they just happened to be the senators for whom it was “safest” to piss people off.

    • solarvector@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      12 hours ago

      That’s how the vote buying and horse trading works. They don’t waste money or political capital getting extra votes on board, it’s a buy and sell game, not anyone actually voting their conscience.

    • snooggums@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      It is likely that getting the exact amount was actually difficult, and it isn’t like the party came out ahead by folding the way they did. It is more likely that the ones who chose short term results on SNAP and paychecks over sky high healthcare costs starting in 2026 expect people to have forgotten it by then. It really does seem like they just didn’t believe that the long term gains were worth the short term pains for whatever stupid reasons they have.