Maven (famous)@lemmy.zip to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 11 months agoDetailed Error Messageslemmy.zipimagemessage-square32fedilinkarrow-up113arrow-down10
arrow-up113arrow-down1imageDetailed Error Messageslemmy.zipMaven (famous)@lemmy.zip to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 11 months agomessage-square32fedilink
minus-squareRecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-211 months ago And we absolutely wanted to shoot the tester who gave us this use case. Why? Because he tested well and broke the software? A user changing their mind during a guided activity absolutely is a valid use case.
minus-squareNeatNit@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up4·11 months agoI think they meant shoot in like a friendly way. You know, happiness bullets!
minus-squareKomfortablesKissen@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2·11 months agoOh, THAT’s what “friendly fire” means!
minus-squareCatLikeLemming@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·11 months agoIt’s likely a difference of emotion compared to logic. Emotionally they’d think “Damn it, now we need to check for such a weird specific edge-case, this is so annoying” while logically knowing it’s better the tester caught it.
Why? Because he tested well and broke the software? A user changing their mind during a guided activity absolutely is a valid use case.
I think they meant shoot in like a friendly way. You know, happiness bullets!
Oh, THAT’s what “friendly fire” means!
hey that tickles!
It’s likely a difference of emotion compared to logic. Emotionally they’d think “Damn it, now we need to check for such a weird specific edge-case, this is so annoying” while logically knowing it’s better the tester caught it.