• Carnelian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I mean I don’t agree with him giving special treatment to his buddies, but why is the FBI wasting time on polygraphs, which are a totally debunked pseudoscience?

    Says in the article they started using them in ‘94…in ‘98 the supreme court ruled that these ‘tests’ were inadmissible in court. Because even back then it was proven that it’s impossible to determine the truth via polygraph at a rate better than simply flipping a coin.

    My only guess is they might ding you on the polygraph if they already learned something through less than legal means, but it’s preposterous to think anyone making it into the FBI would be unfamiliar with the uselessness of the test itself

    • bulwark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 minute ago

      Polygraphs are useful in that you can claim the test subject is lying about anything you want. They’re using it as leverage more than “fact finding.”

    • GlitchyDigiBun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 minutes ago

      It’s more about probing specifically where to look if you want to find dirty laundry when looking for security-clearance candidates. They don’t assume you lied when you said you didn’t do hard drugs, but your body did react to that question deliberately in a way that suggests maybe we should look into a history of drug abuse before we accept you reading about sensitive topics.

      Or sexual scandal blackmail waiting to happen is a great way to get… state secrets… in the… hands of… Oh hey, they raided Mar a Lago, lookit that…