A beuatiful, little gigabit router. Runs great with OpenWrt and can do gigabit throughput with SQM.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      I don’t think so, not by DFRobot at least. That said, I think 2.5G is only useful for >1G internet connections. On the LAN side, the switch is what matters for LAN throughput.

      • Creat@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Or if you have separated your devices into subnets/VLANs. Which becomes more important as your get more hardware that you don’t really trust.

      • yaroto98@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Yep, you’re right. I’m watching my ISP upgrade their cable to docsis 4.0 which will allow for 2g down 1g up. Instead of the garbage 1g down 40mbps up I have now. That upload speed is chaffing.

        But I’m looking for a new toy like this because my current router is only 1g.

        • HeyJoe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          55 minutes ago

          Lol dont complain to much. You could be like me were i only have 1 option and although they just now released fiber earlier this year, im not paying the price for it. I’ve been stuck on 200mbps down and 30mbps up for years now and I’m paying as much if not more than people a few towns over that get 1gb. Also my ISP has no plan that allows over that upload speed no matter what plan you pick.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Got the module some years ago when there were massive shortages. I found a couple CM4s and bought them at the time.

      What are you comparing it to?

  • YerbaYerba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I’ve used this for several years as my home router. I find sqm limits the throughput 10% but I disable it for the ingress anyway. Super reliable so far.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      You’re supposed to set SQM lower than the WAN throughput. I think you’re right that by default it limits it by about 10%. There was some study over a decade ago on this that showed 20-25% limit is best for maximizing responsiveness under load. It’s not possible to effectively schedule packets if there’s no headroom.

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I have a few Pi 4 + UE300 routers in operation that work just as well but this is a nice alternative if you have a CM4 lying around.