• CannonFodder@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    Sure. You realize how bad trump is, way worse than even Hillary. But it’s Americans that voted for trump over Hillary. It’s the stupidity of Americans that you should be blaming.
    It’s so funny how far people go to try to absolve themselves of responsibility.

    • حمید پیام عباسی@crazypeople.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Americans in very specific swing states in manipulated elections voted for Trump. Hilary actually won that election by several million votes. The USA is not a democracy and blaming voters is really a pathetic and wrong understanding of politics.

      • [object Object]@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Ah yes, when it’s Russia then every Russian should suffer for not overthrowing Putin. But when it’s the US, Hillary actually won and “it wasn’t me” anyway, and blaming voters is pathetic.

        • حمید پیام عباسی@crazypeople.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          But it’s Americans that voted for trump over Hillary. It’s the stupidity of Americans that you should be blaming.

          Blaming voters for not voting the right way is in fact pathetic, because their elections are fake. They couldn’t have voted differently because their votes don’t matter. I blame Americans but not for the reasons they were suggesting. I absolutely think that people in the US shouldn’t bother to vote and should instead destroy their fake democracy and settler colony. The USA is worse than Russia in every way. It is in fact the US who over threw the Russian government and installed Putin, it is amazing how they think it is the other way around

      • CannonFodder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        So she should have shifter further right to try to capture the votes in those specific swing states?

          • CannonFodder@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            So she couldn’t have won no matter what. You’re saying she wasn’t a bad candidate, I guess.

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              She was such a bad candidate that she personally couldn’t win no matter how far to the right she went. She might have stood a better chance if she treated the left flank of the party like she actually needed their votes.

              • CannonFodder@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                Why should she have to play games ‘motivating’ people who could see she was significantly better than trump? People didn’t bother to vote against trump - so they got trump. They have no one to blame but themselves.

                • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Why should she have to play games ‘motivating’ people who could see she was significantly better than trump?

                  Because that’s called politics. When you actually care more about winning than about making sure progressives lose, you try to get people to vote for you instead of regarding them with open contempt.

                  • CannonFodder@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    It seems like you are projecting this ‘open contempt’. In an ideal democracy, a politician should state their platform and people should select the best one and vote.
                    She was clearly a better candidate with better policy than trump - and if people saw that they should have voted for her. Saying ‘she didn’t pander to me enough’, or ‘wasn’t perfectly aligned with my ideals’ is stupid in the face of trump as the other option.
                    Yes, she could have said a bunch of pings - she could have lied and attempted to get votes through a populist approach, and maybe that’s what the democrats need to do, as sad as it is. But that’s only because too many Americans are stupid and won’t vote for the obviously better candidate for … reasons.

            • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              I am saying she could have won if she moved left and promised to improve the material conditions the people she was asking to vote for her.

              Moving right does not earn democrats republican votes, it only decreases their own turnout.

              • CannonFodder@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                How would that have made her win? Her policy, and the history of the Democratic Party in contrast to the republicans is that she would be better for the people. Better is better. It doesn’t matter how much really. If people wanted better, they would already vote for her.

                • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  22 hours ago

                  Her messaging was “America is already great”, her policies were means-tested bullshit that anyone who’s gone their entire life not getting help understood wouldn’t apply to them. Hillary was the status quo candidate.

    • Postimo@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I guess we can simply keep losing elections until they educate the entire populace.