I don’t care if you hate it or love it, I just wanna know why you feel the way you do. Bonus points if you want to speak on specific categories you like/dislike.

  • Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Extremely negatively. We already have an overabundance of free porn catering to effectively any fetish you could want, and even fringe stuff has sites, OF models, and r34 artists willing to commission it.

    We do not need to use absurd amounts of water and electricity to produce something that’s already very available. If you have a fetish so niche that you need AI to generate it, you can either pay someone to do it/draw it, or go without.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      Eh I disagree with the power usage point, specifically. Don’t listen to Altman lie through his teeth; generation and training should be dirt cheap.

      See the recent Z Image, which was trained on a shoestring budget and costs basically nothing to run: https://arxiv.org/html/2511.22699v2

      The task energy per image is less than what it took for me to type out this comment.


      As for if we “need” it, yeah, that’s a good point and what I was curious about.

      But then again… I don’t get why people use a lot of porn services. As an example, I just don’t see the appeal of OF, yet it’s a colossal enterprise.

      • Ungraded@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        $628.000 is not exactly shoestring budget.

        Maybe not as much as others are using but I would say by far the most university research groups couldn’t afford that.

        • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          Not in terms of energy use, ~110 Megawatt hours. Even if you multiply that for production costs, test training runs and such, its less energy than an airline flight, or the yearly power consumption of a few homes. And it only needed to be done once.

          It’s not a trivial financial cost though, no.

    • Artisian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      As already indicated; energy and water use is not so big. It costs substantially more data center time to store and stream high def film then to generate even hundreds of images. Generation itself is very resource cheap compared to human actors and a film crew.