• flamiera@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Nothing against it.

    But, there has to be sacrifices for it to work. That being, SNAP and Welfare would have to be axed to make room for UBI. Medicare would remain.

    And I would want it available for a certain threshold of earners. Like people who’re making $0 - $2,000 a month. If you’re well off, then it’s not for you.

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Someone did a study on various means of welfare support, and figured out that doing away with all other forms of poverty easement and replacing it with an equivalent amount of UBI would actually save taxpayers a significant amount of money. And further, it actually costs way more to try to identify and prosecute fraud than the system actually loses to said fraud.

      I think the easiest way to accomplish UBI, without dealing with a lot of rigamarole and nonsense, would be to figure out what amount “basic” should mean—you suggested $2000/mo, but for some cities that would barely cover rent, so maybe let’s say $3000/mo—and then have anyone who wants any form of government financial assistance register with the UBI office, indicating the compensation they receive at their highest-earning job. The UBI office would then simply pay them the difference between $3000 and their monthly paycheck. UBI office automatically cross-references with the IRS every year, so you can’t hide income without getting audited.