Yeah after making an algorithm for peertube I’m gonna say this is too complicated to implement. That graphic might be the the plan and it’s something more simplistic.
Making a simple cosign vector for peertube was a pain
Saying you tried something simpler and it was hard is not proof that this implementation is a fraud. If anything, it just makes you look less credible yourself. If you have specific aspects you can point to that are impractical, and the technical reasons they wouldn’t work, feel free, but it’s not a dodge to say that the diagram makes sense and this team had done a lot of impressive work already.
oh lord your looking for a fight. i tell you this i kinda already won since your looking my input to criticize, but ill say this the personalized focus block alone. that’s an exact “thing” and if you want more well your gonna have to ask more specific questions and your gonna demand that i help you.
also I helped loops in the past. I can tell you that the GitHub code isn’t the code that’s used
Not trying to fight, just wanted to get some perspective of someone critical in a thread where everybody else is very positive. I didn’t read your username and didn’t notice I replied three times to the same guy.
Yeap, turns out you can post junk code on GitHub and say it runs whatever. I never seen anyone independently verify that the GitHub code runs similar to loops or compiles the code for the app
Yeah after making an algorithm for peertube I’m gonna say this is too complicated to implement. That graphic might be the the plan and it’s something more simplistic.
Making a simple cosign vector for peertube was a pain
“I failed at making something, therefore someone else could certainly not make something more complex than the thing I failed at”
K
I didn’t fail, I actually succeeded. Plus judging by how hard it was to do a simple algorithm an algorithm like this would take way too much effort.
Given from the infographic they didn’t even think about an algorithm let alone worked on it
Seriously though, it’s literally already implemented. Might be too complex for you to implement, but apparently not for them.
How do you know it’s implemented as described in the picture?
How do you know it’s not?
I already explained how I know. So you can answer my question or just dodge?
Saying you tried something simpler and it was hard is not proof that this implementation is a fraud. If anything, it just makes you look less credible yourself. If you have specific aspects you can point to that are impractical, and the technical reasons they wouldn’t work, feel free, but it’s not a dodge to say that the diagram makes sense and this team had done a lot of impressive work already.
It actually is on account that it’s real world experience that gives me insight into how algorithms are done. Expertise you don’t have
I’m not worried about credibility since I look more credible than you because you flipped a question and never answered how you know
So buddy you gonna prove the algorithm in loop works exactly like it does in the picture or give me the W?
“Because I did something substantially simpler than this, and struggled to get it done, they must be lying.”
K
Lol you really don’t understand recommendation algorithms 🫵🤣
K
What’s too complicated exactly? They claim their program does precisely that. I believe you could review the code yourself.
oh lord your looking for a fight. i tell you this i kinda already won since your looking my input to criticize, but ill say this the personalized focus block alone. that’s an exact “thing” and if you want more well your gonna have to ask more specific questions and your gonna demand that i help you.
also I helped loops in the past. I can tell you that the GitHub code isn’t the code that’s used
Not trying to fight, just wanted to get some perspective of someone critical in a thread where everybody else is very positive. I didn’t read your username and didn’t notice I replied three times to the same guy.
Nice so you got my perspective then?
really? given that the license is AGPL and they do have some external contributors, they shouldn’t be running an unpublished branch of the code!
Yeap, turns out you can post junk code on GitHub and say it runs whatever. I never seen anyone independently verify that the GitHub code runs similar to loops or compiles the code for the app
You’re*