It is unclear whether the deal would require SpaceX to take steps to protect wildlife or habitats or any cultural resources linked to the land it receives from the government.
It is unclear whether the deal would require SpaceX to take steps to protect wildlife or habitats or any cultural resources linked to the land it receives from the government.
What a loaded headline
I’m not saying this is a good trade, but the quantity and that some will be added to another refuge was well down the page.
It’s a trade, not giving. (Even if really bad)
Better headline: Trump may trade 775 acres of wildlife refuge for 692 acres of less sensitive land in unfair trade. (Or in damaging trade)