people have figured out that the redacted documents released were not done with any redaction tool but merely highlighted boxes. many people are now combing through everything to see what can actually be viewed after all.

  • ThisGuyThat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    11 hours ago

    When I’ve read the “hacked” headlines. I thought to myself “They couldn’t have just highlighted it in black… right?”. Can’t tell if incompetent or chaotic good.

    • IcyToes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      11 hours ago

      It feels like someone wanted this out and had to follow orders. If intentional, it’s brilliant. If not, it’s hilarious.

      • SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Believing that someone engaged in some malicious compliance here would restore a tiny sliver of my faith in humanity… which means it was probably just incompetence.

      • fahfahfahfah@lemmy.billiam.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        This has happened plenty of times before with redacted documents, someone just goes in, sets the highlighting tool to black, and uses it that way, without realizing that doesn’t actually obscure the words underneath like a sharpie would

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Well, I don’t think it’s highlighted in black. They just changed the image or vector data without changing/removing the text data that sits separately but rendered on top of it.

    • chosensilence@pawb.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      of course they goddamn did ahahah nobody can tell a single one of them “no,” or “hey this isn’t a good idea.” they’re all smart, duh.