• SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 hours ago

    No thicker than very popular and successful phones from just 5 years ago. They can use the extra space for a larger battery, so they dont have to nerf performance to maintain stability in older phones. They can also use the space to restore repairability.

    But probably not for a folding phone, since making both sides that thick will probably be too much.

        • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          …no they can’t. Do you realize just how thick modern camera bumps are? Even not including the bump phones nowadays are thicker than phones 5 years ago.

          The iPhone X was 7.7mm thick. The iPhone 17 pro excluding the bump is 8.7.

          • SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Damn, I keep forgetting that the iphone X was already 5 years ago. 10 years ago then. There has been so little improvements in phones in the ladt 5 years, it all just blurs together.

            I think the point is, we used to have phones that were 9mm+ thick. Iphone 4s and iphone 5c from Apple and Samsung Galaxy S3 and motorola G phones were all that thickness. They even had replacable batteries and expandable storage. Some of those were even waterproof despite all of that.

            I think the main driver of impractical thinness has been marketing, planned obselecence and cost savings.