monica_b1998@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 hours agoWhat an unprocessed photo looks likemaurycyz.comexternal-linkmessage-square10fedilinkarrow-up1114arrow-down12cross-posted to: hackernews
arrow-up1112arrow-down1external-linkWhat an unprocessed photo looks likemaurycyz.commonica_b1998@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 hours agomessage-square10fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews
minus-squareJeeBaiChow@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·3 hours agoGood read. Funny how I always thought the sensor read rgb, instead of simple light levels in a filter pattern.
minus-squareDavel23@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up2·50 minutes agoFor a while the best/fanciest digital cameras had three CCDs, one for each RGB color channel. I’m not sure if that’s still the case or if the color filter process is now good enough to replace it.
minus-square_NetNomad@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 hours agowild how far technology has marched on and yet we’re still essentially using the same basic idea behind technicolor. but hey, if it works!
Good read. Funny how I always thought the sensor read rgb, instead of simple light levels in a filter pattern.
For a while the best/fanciest digital cameras had three CCDs, one for each RGB color channel. I’m not sure if that’s still the case or if the color filter process is now good enough to replace it.
wild how far technology has marched on and yet we’re still essentially using the same basic idea behind technicolor. but hey, if it works!